An Ode to the IBF (Indian Badminton Federation)

India won the bronze medal last week at the Asian Mixed Team Badminton Championship. Also, India won the Thomas Cup for the first time in 2022. Both of these are moments of hair-raising exhilaration! And as we rejoice in these fantastic achievements of the athletes and the women and men in their support ecosystems, I would like to share an experience from the first half of the 1990s, which in my personal opinion is the pivot that created an ecosystem that produces champion badminton players in India.

In the early to the mind 1990s, somewhere between 1993 and 1996, if I recall right, there were two badminton associations in India. One was the old BAI (Badminton Association of India) and the other was the IBF (Indian Badminton Federation), if I recall right. The IBF was an upstart rival that was formed due to the ineffectiveness of the BAI. The IBF was formed by the great Prakash Padukone.

The IBF, as I remember, was formed in protest against the BAI, which by then had become fairly ineffective and was of no use to players. It had a president emeritus at the time. Prakash Padukone formed the IBF as a rival to the BAI and almost all players supported it unanimously. Everyone became a member of the IBF and rejected the BAI.

This was well before the era of social media and though it was widely reported in the print media of the time, it was not big news on television, which had not yet seen a spurt in the number of private channels. There was only the behemoth of the old Doordarshan which I do not remember reporting this issue with any great zeal. Also, this was a time when India was not a sporting nation and had no celebrated sporting heroes. Even the men’s cricket team was having a tough time in this period. So, all this led to this epochal protest in Indian badminton not being remembered much these days, when Indian badminton is a world powerhouse.

At around this time was also formed the PPBA, the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in Bangalore which was based out of the Canara Union badminton courts. The construction of the KBA stadium was still in progress back then, according to some, at a glacial pace. The PPBA tutored the most promising players from many states among both men and women. This was the foundation of really good and modern training ecosystem for the game in our country. Aparna Popat, Manjusha Kanwar and many other great players who were forerunners of the champions of today were among those who were a part of the PPBA in its early days. Apart from Prakash Padukone, Vimal Kumar, another legend of Indian Badminton was also a leading light of both the PPBA and the IBF.

The success and popularity of the IBF and the PPBA led to the capitulation of the BAI. The old dinosaur went extinct. The president resigned and the post was offered to Prakash Padukone, who, if I recall right again, held the post for some time. Once this change took place, the IBF was dissolved and merged into the BAI to resume the existing continuity from before the revolt.

Also, with this change, the BAI morphed over time into the proactive organization that exists today. Whether or not it is a model sports organization, it is a huge improvement over the old one. The modern sports ecosystem that was created, nurtured and improved over time has produced the crop of champions we all know and love, from the second half of the first decade of the twenty first century. I am penning down these thoughts because as successful revolts go, I can think of no other in the sporting arena. Nor can I think of any rebellion or protest in any area of life that achieved all its objectives and changed the entire ecosystem for the better. Perhaps Prakash Padukone and Vimal Kumar, in my personal opinion, are far greater heroes of this nation for this monumental institutional reform, even more than for their sporting achievements.

All hail the IBF!

Vyuha and Taijutsu

Chakravyuha (Moving spiral formation) carved on the Hoysaleshwara temple wall, Halebidu, Karnataka

Vyuha is generally identified as a formation for battle. This is something most of us learn from our reading of Amar Chitra Katha comics as kids. We all know that the Chakravyuha was deadly from the Kurukshetra war. We have also heard the names of several other vyuha from the same war, Vajra vyuha, Shakata vyuha, Makara vyuha, Krauncha vyuha, Suchi vyuha, Sarvatobhadra vyuha and many others. What we do not know is the specific advantages and disadvantages of each of these and when they are supposed to be used. Was it at the discretion of the senapati, or raja or were other criteria considered? Like geography, the weather, number and quality of troops and equipment at hand? We do not have, or at least I have not heard of any military manual describing these aspects.

What I find mind boggling is how were these vyuha or formations achieved? How much training of troops is needed to get them into that specific formation? How long does it take? What high levels of discipline is needed to hold these vyuha? And can all troops form all vyuha or was there any specialization? For example, the most popular Chakra vyuha was supposed to be a continuously moving spiral. How was the positioning of the troops decided? And who coordinated the movement? How was communication achieved if a vyuha was fraying at some point or if reinforcements were needed at some point in the vyuha? When was the decision made to abandon a given vyuha and how was that communicated? What were the criteria to decide if the vyuha was ready and if it was successful? Was there some analysis post the use of a vyuha to see if could be improved? There are no ready answers to any of these questions that I know of.

Now, there is this concept of Taijutsu that many Japanese Martial Arts use. The different art forms might use different terms for it, but the concept is the same. In modern day parlance, it is translated for simplicity as body movement or prosaically “art of the body”. Tai meaning body and Justsu meaning “Art of”. But I have been told by my teachers that originally Tai meant a unit of troops and all their equipment like armour, weapons, rations and also their horses or beasts of burden if they had any. So, Taijutsu was meant in the past to mean “Art of a Unit” where a unit is a body of troops. I have heard it said that a Tai was generally meant to be a squad of soldiers, a squad being a smaller unit than a platoon. So Taijutsu was all about working as a team with all that they had access to. One can assume that since there was a specific term for this, it was meant for teams to work together efficiently and effectively.

In the modern day when we train traditional martial arts, we do not really use those concepts for professional fighting, but for various other purposes ranging from entertainment to personal development and everything in-between. Hence, when Taijutsu is used in a modern day martial arts class (teaching Japanese martial arts), it means move your body as one (not a unit of troops moving as one, but your body as one). That means, your core moves and your limbs, neck and head move with it, there are no twists and limb movements that are unnecessary (or stand-alone). This is taught to help keep one’s balance, so as to be more effective in any movement that is carried out, be it with or without weapons (traditional weapons in the context of a class). An example of this would be a punch where only the hand moves and the hips are not lowered or the legs are not in the correct position. This punch would be far less effective compared to one executed with correct movement of the legs and hips which make the punch a lot more devastating.

We also know that there are several martial art forms around the world and they were all used effectively at a given time and place. The fact that they were effective generally means that the practitioners of the art form were trained it its use. This means having some form of Taijutsu, irrespective of the term used for the same. And each of these were designed to give the practitioners of the art form an advantage in the purpose for the use of the art (be it in a narrow palace corridor, in a wooded area, on a boat, as a bodyguard, with large field weapons etc).

With this introduction, we can finally move ahead with what I was thinking. 😊

Each school or art form or ryuha has specific tenets relating to Taijutsu. For example, the Takagi Yoshin Ryu, which we were training when these thoughts came to mind, has among its tenets, the following principles.

  • Stacking the opponent’s hips
  • Using leverage against the opponent’s joints
  • Moving in a direction perpendicular to the opponent’s direction
  • Moving forward and not backward while facing an opponent

Also, from what I have learnt, the Takagi Yoshin Ryu was developed as a school mainly used by bodyguard. Hence, they disarmed and immobilized opponents as against killing them. Perhaps this was to gather information later or to not spill blood in the presence of one’s lord or any other reason. To disarm and immobilize opponents, the tenets mentioned above were built into their Taijutsu.

From my experience with the training of Takagi Yoshin Ryu, it is designed to use the structure of uke’s body and hence a really skilled and experienced practitioner of this Ryu can fight an opponent without the active use of eyesight. This Ryu is a Jutaijutsu and hence fighting happens in close quarters and thus, one can feel the tensions and hence intentions of the uke and counter the same by reading the uke’s joints and body movement. The right distances to achieve a strike or lock are also determined by this feeling. So, over time, the feeling and flow of the Uke (opponent) becomes the driving force for a practitioner and not just the tenets. The tenets lead to the feeling and vice versa in a virtuous cycle. Now, let us expand the same concept to a Vyuha. Was an experienced Senapati (Commander-in-chief of the army) or Raja (King) able to read an enemy’s battle tactics and his own troops requirements the same way one is supposed to read an opponent in Takagi Yoshin Ryu? This is not easy and requires a lot of training time to express successfully in one-on-one combat. So, how much skill, ability, training and natural affinity for the feeling of a battle and battlefield should a practitioner of Taijutsu at the level of a large body of troops need?! This is a question and a matter of awe at the same time. What kind of training and experience would the development of such abilities involve? Where does one begin (as it clearly happened a lot in the past and still happens today)? How did the evolution of information gathering, and technology influence this practice and its evolution? These are questions I do not have answers to, just points to ponder about.

Padmavyuha (Lotus formation), Shakatavyuha (Cart formation) and Suchivyuha (Needle formation) – 3 merged into one, top image

Notes:

  1. The above comic book images are from my personally owned books.
  2. The images of the vyuha are representative only, they are not to be considered exact.

Vali, Sugreeva, Rama, Dropping out, Takagi Yoshin Ryu and Kyojaku jugo Arubekarazu

Remember that part of the Ramayana where Rama has to shoot Vali from hiding, while the latter duels Sugreeva? This sequence brings so many thoughts, what an incredible archer Rama should have been, to be able to shoot one of the duelists, while the duelists did not position themselves in any predictable manner! Or was Sugreeva moving in a specific manner in the duel so as to allow Rama a clear shot at Vali while ensuring he is out of the way of the arrow; how difficult must this have been, while fighting for one’s life and also knowing you could be shot by an arrow intended for your opponent.

A few months ago*, we were applying the feeling and concepts of the Takagi Yoshin Ryu with the Sanshin no Kata and Kunai Waza feeling. This was then added to the Japanese poem about a lack of dualities and how to keep the heart in the place of nothingness to start on the path to wisdom. This was the first time we had heard the poem in its entirety and that too in an artwork created by Nagato Sensei. We had until now only heard the first of the four lines of the poem, “Kyojaku jugo arubekarazu”.

During this training, I observed my teacher Shiva actively let go of all body tension and cause severe problems to the attacker (Uke). He was constantly dropping out of any uke nagashi or movement he made, and this caused serious impediments to the ability and will of the Uke to keep up the attack, and this was clearly visible in a Jutaijutsu like situation. This observation and learning are what prompted the train of thought I am expressing in this article.

So, back to the Ramayana. It is known (I mean from other stories in the Hindu scriptures) that Vali was a warrior of unparalleled strength and skill. He was invincible one on one, there is no doubt there at all. Vali defeated Ravana in single combat so effortlessly, it was not even a fight, just a humiliation for Ravana. And Ravana was as fearsome a warrior as one can imagine. Also, Vali had a boon which rendered his opponent at 50% of his or her fighting ability, and the remaining 50% got added to Vali’s own fighting ability. So, an opponent, the moment he or she chose to become Vali’s opponent was diminished while facing an opponent vastly superior to what one might have been prepared to face.

An aside here, a whole article can be considered to discuss how an opponent’s ability reduces by 50%, from a martial arts perspective, at least from a Bujinkan perspective as I see it.

It is also known that Sugreeva could not take on Vali in a war, where armies would be involved. Sugreeva was a fugitive in Vali’s kingdom and had a band of followers, not an army. Further, he would not have gone to war even if he could, for he did not want a civil war. He only wanted his wife back (held captive as a wife by Vali) and Vali eliminated for the person he had become post the Dundhubi episode. So, it was always going to be single combat between Sugreeva and Vali. Vali himself was never going to shrink away from a duel, such was his justified confidence in his own ability. So, he would not use his troops to cheat and eliminate or capture Sugreeva without defeating him in the duel.

Sugreeva also knew he could not defeat Vali in single combat (Dwand or Dwandwa yuddha). This situation set up the need to eliminate Vali by stealth. We also know that Rama was extraordinary as a warrior. And superlative as an archer. Of course, Vali was a fantastic archer as well, but the duel between him and Sugreeva did not involve bows and arrows. Also, Rama was also really strong, as seen from the ease with which he moved Dundhubi’s skeleton. His strength is also demonstrated when his one arrow felled seven coconut trees. His archery skill is also shown earlier in the Ramayana where he is the best at not only hitting the target but also with the speed of reloading, shooting and restringing his bow.

So, Rama is the perfect choice for taking the shot while the duel takes place. There is also an additional complexity in the situation. Vali and Sugreeva, being brothers, resemble each other very closely. In the first duel between Vali and Sugreeva, Rama cannot decide who to shoot due to this resemblance. Sugreeva has to flee for his life, abandoning the duel. Vali seems to have been satisfied with his victory and his brother’s humiliation and not expanded efforts to eliminate his brother and his band in a great way after this first duel.

With all this as background, let us look at the second duel. This time Sugreeva wore a garland to allow Rama to distinguish him from his brother. Also, I have not heard of, read of or seen any specify strategy planned ahead of the duel that would allow Rama to shoot Vali with minimal risk to Sugreeva. I also do not know if the duel was nudged by Sugreeva by his movements to maneuver Vali to a position where he would be a target while reducing risk to himself.

I also do not know what Vali’s state of mind was or his method of fighting in the second duel. With that said, imagine how incredible this shot that Rama took was. He had only one shot. Clearly the duel was far enough away that he could not distinguish Sugreeva without the garland. The shot had to ensure it hit its target in the midst of a dynamic duel. A fight between two accomplished warriors (Sugreeva was a great warrior, inferior only to Rama, Vali, Ravana and the other superlatives) sees the two always in motion. Neither stands still even if not in contact, to achieve an advantageous position or posture. In this dynamic situation, ensuring that an arrow hits its target before he moves while also being sure that that the arrow does not hit the other person, who might occupy the same position where the target was just a moment ago is scary to even think about!

If the duel was with spears or some other long weapon, the situation might have been easier for Rama because a pole weapon puts a lot of space between the duelists, more than sufficient for an archer as good as Rama. Bur from what I know, the duel was with either gadas (maces) or an unarmed fight (grappling and striking). The gada is not a long weapon and does not put the opponents at a distance that is safe for one from an archer, not to mention unarmed combat, which puts far smaller space between the two.

So, Rama had to not just take a shot, but understand Vali in this specific duel! How difficult is that! If Vali was being nonchalant and letting Sugreeva do the work and fall into strikes or locks, he would have to predict Vali’s nonchalance! If Vali was angry at a second duel in a short span of time and against an opponent who ran away the last time, would he be aggressive and go for the kill and thus ensure a short duel? If this was true, Rama had to be sure to predict Vali’s next attack to take the shot at the right time, considering any delay might spell doom for Sugreeva. And he had to do this with only one reference fight to go by! However much Rama had heard of Vali’s fighting, he had seen him fight only once! So, getting the right shot by going with the flow of a fight he was not involved in; can anyone imagine that! And in a life-or-death situation for his friend; Rama would be considered divine for this ability alone, let alone all his other qualities as a human being! Yes, I am aware of all the exclamation marks in this paragraph, this is how awesome the situation was.

Now let us look at this situation from Sugreeva’s perspective. We do not know if there was a plan beyond Rama killing Vali while he dueled Sugreeva. Sugreeva has received a hiding and barely got away with his life in the first duel. So, what levels of faith mush he have had in Rama to try the same thing again! Imagine this, he was wearing a garland to distinguish himself from Vali. But we do not know what the garland was made of. If it was any regular garland, how much effort would he have to expend to ensure it was not ripped off his neck? And worse still, the garland gave extra holding space for Vali, who was already the superior fighter. Would this be a fatal disadvantage?

Next, how did Sugreeva feel about Rama taking a shot at Vali? How nervous would even a great warrior feel knowing that the slightest error from Rama might end up killing him and not his opponent? Would this knowledge affect his fighting style? And would this change result in Vali realizing something was wrong? And if that had to be overcome, would any change he made to his fighting movement result in a fatal error? Again, this was the second time he was putting himself in harm’s way in a short span of time. If he had a plan and this was also known to Rama, would that even come to pass? What changes in Vali’s state of mind and fighting style would render their plan useless or would that be an advantage?

We can see a lot of questions come up in the mind of any martial artist as we see above. Given all this, both Sugreeva and Rama would have had to go with the flow of the duel and implicitly trust each other’s ability. “NO PRESSURE” in all caps does begin to express the extraordinary danger that Sugreeva was in and hence the expectation from Rama. Did Sugreeva have any sacrificial moves to render Vali open to Rama’s shot? We do not know. But we do know that the plan succeeded. Sugreeva survived, Rama’s shot was successful and fatal for Vali. This achievement in itself calls for reverence not just in Rama, but in Sugreeva’s judgement of people’s abilities and his own skill as a warrior (he had Hanuman in his band after all, that should have been a dead giveaway 😊). Also, as a martial artist, it kind of encompasses the meaning of the “Kyojaku jugo…” poem. Both Rama and Sugreeva had to let go of so many necessities for a PLAN to succeed and trust to just an objective (Vali’s death) and a path (there will be a duel and a shot in stealth at Vali). There could have been no option for any detailing, just a lot of faith in each other and the need to achieve the objective. How incredibly cool is that?

*This article was written back in the beginning of June 2022, before I had started a blog.

The Ashta Siddhi and Budo

The Ashta Siddhi are regarded with great reverence in Hindu culture. “Ashta” means eight, “Siddhi” is an ability or skill, but could also be termed as a power. Siddhi is something that is achieved through Saadhana, which is thorough and sustained practice. Many of the great Gods and Goddesses from Hindu scripture and the epics are said to have achieved the Ashta Siddhi. These include various forms of the Devi, Ganesha, Krishna, and most popularly, Lord Hanuman had all mastered the Ashta Siddhi.

The Ashta Siddhi are as defined below.

  1. Anima – The ability to make one’s self very small
  2. Mahima – The ability to make one’s self very large
  3. Laghima – The ability to make one’s self very light
  4. Garima – The ability to make one’s self very heavy
  5. Praapti – The ability to get or obtain whatever one wants
  6. Praakaamya – The ability to acquire or achieve anything one wants
  7. Vashitva – The ability to control anything or everything
  8. Eeshitva – The ability to be superior to everything or attain Godhood

From a cursory look at the eight abilities mentioned above, it is easy to notice how they are related in pairs and complement each other.

  • Anima and Mahima are related to the physical volume of the person with the ability.
  • Laghima and Garima are related to the physical mass of the person with the ability.
  • Praapti and Praakaamya go hand in hand since one has to be able to acquire to obtain something and one should be able to receive something that is acquired.
  • Vashitva and Eeshitva are related because to be able to control everything is to be a God, and to be a God requires the ability to control everything.

Another aspect to consider with relation to the Ashta Siddhi is the fact that these abilities are associated with the Gods in Hindu culture. This generally suggests two things. One is that these abilities are not attainable by normal mortal humans. The second is that these are fantastical and since they are associated with religion and the Gods, they are all fantasy. Both of these are valid.

Some of the definitions used for Anima mention that it is the ability to shrink one’s self to atomic sizes and the Mahima is to be able to expand one’s self infinitely. An example of Anima is when Hanuman shrank himself to the size of a fly when he slew Mahiravana to save Rama and Lakshmana from being sacrificed. Similarly an example of Mahima is when Hanuman expanded his size to be able to lift a mountain to save Laskhmana during the war in Lanka. This definitely is beyond what normal humans can ever do.

Similarly, one of the definitions of Laghima is to be able to make oneself as light as air! Praapti and Praakaamya by definition seem magical. How can one obtain anything one wants or acquire anything one wants! All normal humans have limitations and constraints. The last two abilities again, by definition are to achieve divinity and thus, are beyond normal humans.

Of course, there are people who do say that these are abilities that can be and are achieved through prolonged and intense yoga and yogic practices. I am not aware of anyone who has ever been able to demonstrate these abilities as defined in the absolute superhuman sense. If there are people with such abilities, they have kept themselves from the public eye.

With this introduction, I would like to look at a few concepts from Budo and the martial arts which explain the eight abilities in a more mundane manner. These concepts are analogous to the Ashta Siddhi, but only as they would be used in a fight between humans or in a situation needing conflict management among normal humans.

Fair warning, these concepts from Budo are very simple in some cases and relevant only in a fight, not even remotely are they magical, but are certainly based on common sense. Also, the analogues from Budo might not pair up as neatly as the original eight, nor would they be as neatly flowing from one to the other like the original eight. They just go to show that the same (or at least similar) concepts exist in both cases, while one is preserved with magical stories, the other through living martial art forms that have a long history and lineage. Perhaps the use of stories is what allowed the Ashta Siddhi to be so neatly flowing from one to another? One can only speculate.

Anima and Garima

The concept of Anima and Garima go hand in hand in reality. When one lowers her or his core (essentially one’s centre of gravity), the person feels heavier to anyone trying to dislodge them from that specific posture. This is true in all martial arts and sports and it is common sense for all humans. This is also at the root of all kamae, or physical posture in the basics of Budo.

What one has done in lowering her or his core is most likely widen one’s stance, by increasing the distance one’s feet and bent the knees, thus also reducing the height. So, the “size” of the person has reduced in one of the 3 axes (consider it the Z axis) while also seemingly increased the weight with the same mass. So, in effect, one has become smaller and heavier at the same time.

Thus, these two are really easy to understand. If a martial artist trains her or his core and leg strength and the ability to move her or his feet easily irrespective of physical size, both Anima and Garima are achieved. The speed of movement of the legs also depends on the martial artist not resting on the heels and instead learning to use the ball of the feet and the toes to hold their weight.

Image credit – “The Ramayana” published by Amar Chitra Katha

Of course, reducing one’s size also includes being able to go down on the knees, falling and getting up, sitting down and getting up as well. It also includes being able to change the angle of one’s self in relation to the attacker. For example, turning one’s side to the attacker exposes a far smaller surface area open to the attack (this is making one’s self smaller in either the X or Y axes). This is like a primary tenet of the “Totoku Hyoshi no Kamae” (the posture to protect oneself by making oneself as small as possible to use whatever one’s weapon is, as a shield).

There are a few other concepts that come to mind as going hand in hand with the Siddhis of Anima and Garima. One relating to Garima is the concept of Fudo, which translates to “Immovable”. To be immovable one needs to be of great mass, or more realistically, be able to manoeuvre one’s size and weight as required by the situation to prevent one’s footing or balance from being taken by the opponent. Here, I am not considering the use of Fudo in relation to one’s spirit or attitude.

Image credit – “The Ramayana” published by Amar Chitra Katha

In the Bujinkan, we study the Gyokko Ryu. The origin of this school is supposedly by a Chinese princess and was to be applied by a small person for defence in the somewhat smaller confines of an indoor setting. Complementing this, the theme of the year for the year 2015 in the Bujinkan, was “Goshinjutsu”. This translates as “self-protection” (NOT self-defence). One of the things taught as part of this theme was to be able to protect one’s self while not being big and strong. Soke Hatsumi Masaaki emphasized that all practitioners should learn to move and fight like women; he meant that one should learn to be able move and fight like a generally smaller and less strong person against any size of opponent. This concept holds true irrespective of whether one is a man or a woman, young or old. The Gyokko Ryu, by virtue of its origins emphasizes that one should be able to keep one’s size small and heavy (when necessary). This is to not only present a smaller target (bundle of opportunities) to the opponent, but also to not be constrained by one’s size in any space (a large person might not be able to move freely indoors). This also means that any attack on an opponent will require generating power with a shorter strike range.

Mahima and Laghima

Mahima and Laghima, as a converse of Anima and Garima, go hand in hand, though not exactly. While lowering one’s core or centre of gravity increases stability, this is detrimental to quick movement. Stability generates an inertia against movement and so adds a little extra effort to move. This is great for training though, and with time, it might be mitigated to quite an extent.

But then, one needs to understand Mahima not as an opposite of Anima, but as a transformation of the body. If one needs to perform a roll, a human being has to reduce her or his size in the vertical direction or Z axis and increase size in the horizontal direction, at the beginning of and during the roll, depending on how far the roll needs to be. So, in a real scenario where there is no magic and no spontaneous shrinking or expanding happens at a cellular level, Mahima and Anima are complementing each other, where a reduction is size in one axis results in an increase in another.

Laghima on the other hand is not really about a change in the size or shape or even posture, but more about control of one’s own body. This again relates to the extent of, duration of and quality of training a martial artist has put in. The ability to use the toes and ball of the feet as against the heels, the strength in the core and control of the same, ability to move the entire body as one, control of the facea, all of these play a role in the ability of the martial artist to achieve Laghima in her or his movements.

One of the definitions of Laghima is to be very light and be able to float, like on air***. In Budo, there is a concept called Ishito Bashi. This refers to the stones skipping on water. This concept captures the essence of Laghima very well. Stones being heavier than water should skink, but then, when they strike the surface at a specific angle and velocity, they can and do bounce off the surface multiple times. This does not mean the skipping stone is lighter than water, but can surely behave that way under the right circumstances. In this same manner, a martial artist is taught to be able to be extremely responsive to an attacker’s movements, and even intentions.

Image credit – “The Ramayana” published by Amar Chitra Katha

This concept means a martial artist (Budoka) should not be stiff in the body and fixated in her or his intended movements. But instead, should be able to respond to the opponent (not just react). This requires being light on the feet and flexible in the body and mind. This also leads to additional concepts like “listening with the whole body” and training one’s intuitive abilities in a conflict management scenario. In other words by not being tied down by a stiff body and preconceived notions in the mind, one is extremely light and able to respond almost instantaneously to an opponent, making it seem like one is impossible to hit or respond to, for the opponent gets no feedback at all to form an attack. To put it in a poetic manner, a Budoka can, with lots of good training, “float on the intentions of the opponent”, just as a stone can skip on water. This is just a practical application to someone saying you should be light as the air and impossible to either catch or hit.

Having considered the concept of rendering oneself incapable of being attacked by being light, it must be understood that the same can be achieved through armour. This is using technology to augment physical abilities or making up for the lack of the same, or both in some cases. Armour protects the body and can allow one to get away with not being able to be light and move very efficiently. But armour also makes one heavier, and also larger. Think of all the body armour used in the past; samurai armour, full plate harness, or even modern day body armour. All of these make a person larger (in volume). Add a helmet to this and even the height is increased. Overall, a person appears more substantial in armour.

In the Bujinkan, we train the Kukishinden Ryu, a martial school which traditionally used armour. The use of the same necessitates a physical posture with any weapon to be larger than one when not using armour. For this reason, there is even a kamae (physical posture) called “Daijodan no kamae” which translates to “large high level posture”, the key here being the prefix “Dai” (large).

Image credit – “Mahabharata 20 – Arjuna’s Quest for Weapons” published by Amar Chitra Katha

This also shows how being large, or using Mahima, can also refer to just occupying greater space, like in armour. Hence, adding a weapon to the mix also achieves the same. This seems pretty similar to a country being considered powerful in the modern sense if it has the ability to strike far from its shores due to standoff range weapons and long range missiles. Or possess the ability to cripple other nations with armies of hackers in the cyberspace. The country can be small, but the “space” it controls (exercise influence over), geographical or cyber is “large”.

Praapti

The word “Praapti” and its forms are still used pretty often, compared to the terms for the other seven Siddhis. In Kannada for example, it could be “Avanige yenu praapta aayithu?” or “What did he get?” and in Hindi an example could be “Tumne kya praapt kiya?” or “What did you obtain?” As seen in these two examples, in common parlance “Praapti” means “get” or “obtain”. In either case, it boils down to “receiving” something.

The concept of “receiving” is literally the foundation of both the basics and advanced stages of the martial arts in the Bujinkan system. Ukemi and Uke Nagashi are the first things taught in the basics of the Bujinkan. Ukemi refers to “receiving the ground” and hence involves rolls and break falls. It has everything to do with how to injure oneself the least when one has to fall. Uke Nagashi refers to “receiving the uke (opponent)”. This deals with the different ways one can absorb, block, counter, deflect or evade an attack whether the attack is from a higher, lower or any other angle. So, literally, how one can obtain safety while being attacked or falling is the crux of this “receiving” and reiterates how one should be able to have “praapti” of safety.

Image credit – “Mahabharata 41 – The Ashwamedha Yajna” published by Amar Chitra Katha

At a more advanced level, as Nagato Sensei (One of the senior most teachers in the Bujinkan) says, everything begins with Sakkijutsu. Sakkijutsu is about developing the intuitive ability in a fight (or any conflict management situation in daily life) to be able to move pre-emptively to either cause the opponent(s) to be in a disadvantageous position or to put one’s self in the safest or most advantageous position in relation to the opponent.

In order to be able to use intuition to one’s advantage, there are two things that are needed. First, one must have a lot of experience in training, of trusting one’s intuition and facing the consequences of failing to do so. The second relates to what we discussed with respect to Laghima, to be able to listen to the opponent and her or his surroundings to be able to intuit their intention and moves. The first of these two is about receiving knowledge and experience (Gyan aur anubhav “praapt” karo – in Hindi). The second is about receiving information from the opponent and surroundings, even when it is not explicit. Here, Praapti is all about obtaining the ability to survive, through safety and perhaps success. This is something everyone does at all times in life. We use experience to be great in any field and usually this is because we can read the situation and be in the right place at the right time. Perhaps this is a precursor to being lucky.

Praakaamya

This is the Siddhi that, from my perspective, belies any direct correlation with a concept in Budo. Praakaamya means the ability to acquire anything. Because this article is in English, there is one question that would surely come up. What is the difference between “obtain” and “acquire”? The general understanding would be that “acquire” implies more effort on the part of the person who gets something, as against “obtain” which could be either effort or any other means, like finding, being gifted and such. This is why I have understood “Praapti” to mean “receive” more than to “obtain”. So, by my interpretation, while “Praapti” is to receive, “Praakaamya” is to be able to take. So, with respect to “Praapti”, the person receiving is, to an extent passive, while with “Praakaamya” the person taking is, to an extent, active. Also, like Praapti, Praakaamya also relates to life in general, not specifically to a fight.

With this basic detail about Praakaamya Siddhi, let us look at some concepts from conflict management, war strategies and a situation where individuals are fighting. In any conflict, if one has all the information about the abilities, numbers and position of an opponent(s), and also knows everything about one’s own strengths, skills, numbers and positions, the opponent can always be overcome. This is true if the same information is not available to the opponent.

In Budo, we learn two concepts, one called “Yoyu” and another called “Kurai Dori”. Yoyu refers to having a surplus of everything. Kurai Dori refers to strategic positioning. If one has a surplus of information, experience and skill, once can always achieve a favourable strategic position against an opponent, and cause the opponent to be in a disadvantageous situation or maybe defeated. Also, if one is able to achieve favourable a strategic position, gathering surplus information might become easier. These two are thus, complementary.

Image credit – “Mahabharata 41 – The Ashwamedha Yajna” published by Amar Chitra Katha

With the Siddhi of Praapti, one has all the skills, experience and also all the information about the opponent. With the trained intuitive** abilities, if the opponent knows or plans somethings (or even thinks it!), so does the one defending. So, with Praapti achieved, one has everything needed to always achieve a successful strategic position against an opponent. Thus, Kurai Dori is a variant of Praakaaamya in a conflict. If one can “acquire” a strategic position, once can acquire a surplus of everything, including information, so “Yoyu” is achieved. With these two concepts applied in practice, anything can be achieved, and thus anything can be acquired. In this way “Praapti” and “Praakaamya” form a virtuous cycle, as do “Yoyu” and “Kurai Dori” Thus, “Yoyu” and “Kurai Dori” are a fair approximation of Praakaamya. Of course, this needs a foundation in Praapti, represented by Sakkijutsu, Ukemi, Uke Nagashi and other layers of training.

Vashitva

Before delving into Vasitva and its antecedents in Budo, I need to clarify something here. As I have been writing this article, I realize that I have to clarify the progression of the eight Siddhis. They are not acquired linearly. It is at best circular. The eight Siddhis complement and enable each other. It is not like eight different weapons being acquired. It is more akin to having a weapons platform, like a fighter aircraft, whose sensor package, weapons array and engine behaviour are variable and mission specific. The airframe with its stealth abilities is like one of the Siddhis, while what this platform carries are the rest.

The above point was important as we discuss the last two Siddhis. I have seen some mention Vashitva first, and some others mention Eeshitva. Personally, I feel Vashitva should be before Eeshitva for reasons I hope will be clear in a bit.

In Indian vernacular languages, “Vashikarana” means to be able to hypnotize and thus control someone. “Vasha” means control. Thus “Vashitva” means “to be able to control”. So, the seventh Siddhi is to be able to control an opponent(s) or just about anything on the planet, like plants, birds, insects and animals. When speaking of control, it is vital to mention that one should not let oneself be controlled and also ensure the following two. One should not let on that he or she is not being controlled and if possible, also make the opponent believe that they are in control.

Image credit – “Hanuman to the Rescue – Tales of Hanuman” published by Amar Chitra Katha

In the Bujinkan, there is a trinity of concepts, “Toatejutsu”, “Shinenjutsu” and “Fudo Kana Shibari”. “Toatejutsu” refers to “striking from a distance”, “Shinenjutsu” refers to “capturing the soul/spirit of the opponent” and “Fudo Kana Shibari” refers to “an unshakable iron grip”. The three used together refers to “Striking from a distance to capture the soul/spirit of the opponent in an unshakable iron grip”. The soul or spirit here refers to the fighting spirit or the will to fight of the opponent(s). If this is achieved, Vashitva is as well.

The path to achieving the three concepts mentioned above and therefore Vashitva, is found in some of the themes of the year in the Bujinkan in the past 20 years. The themes I am referring to are, “Kasumi no Ho”, “Kuki Taisho” and “Menkyo kaiden”. “Kasumi no ho” refers to the “way of fog”, “Kuki taisho” refers to “the smile of the ninth demon” and Menkyo Kaiden refers to “confusing the opponent with conflicting signals”.

“Kasumi no ho” means moving in a way that causes confusion to the opponent, and hence affects either the will to fight of the opponent or causes the opponent’s plan of action and therefore the intent to falter due to induced self-doubt. “Kuki taisho” is about being so confident in one’s own ability and exuding menace without any action. This is an attitude to cultivate in oneself. This attitude is supposed to actively deter a fight or conflict from occurring because the opponent’s will to fight wilts before the fight ever begins. “Menkyo kaiden” is about messing with the opponent’s mind. This is roughly “kasumi no ho” with the will of the opponent (Kasumi no ho itself was related to physical movement). It can also be called “kuki taisho” applied repeatedly at varying intervals for varying durations. Of course, all these are layers added on top of one another, first achieve the physical and add the intellectual and emotional aspects to embellish the physical. As must be obvious by the objective of these three concepts, they lead to controlling the opponent’s will and his or her means to fight (this includes the plan of action). This is “Vashitva” 101.

I have to add here, specifically in relation to the Bujinkan system. The focus on “control” has been paramount since Hatsumi Sensei started his focus on Muto Dori from around 2018. Everything he has been teaching focuses on control. First, try to achieve complete control on oneself and then this will likely lead to control of the opponent(s). Of course, this is a wonderful concept, but frightfully hard to achieve, even just the first part about self-control. So, achievement of “Vashitva” is literally what Soke has been driving towards over the last few years.

I have one last point to consider with regard to “Vashitva”. If one can control one’s shape and size, weight and volume through the achievement of Anima, Mahima, Laghima and Garima, the first four Siddhis, one should be able to go anywhere and reach anywhere (specifically in the context of the martial arts or a fight, but in general as well). Then, that person should be able to obtain or receive anything and hence acquire anything. If one can have anything that is needed at will at and all times, through the achievement of the Siddhis of Praapti and Praakaamya, one has already achieved self-control and hence should be able to control everything and all opponents, thus achieving Vashitva. If one can control everything, then one can continue to obtain and acquire anything and thus perpetuate the ability to control one’s own mass and volume (it just means that newer means to achieve the first four Siddhis can always be discovered). This is what I was referring to when I suggested that the Siddhis are more circular rather than linear. They feed off and add to each other, completing the virtuous cycle. And this leads us to the eighth Siddhi.

Eeshitva

I have seen the meaning of this Siddhi as “the ability to force or influence anyone” or “absolute superiority” and even “the ability to restore life to the dead”. Personally, I feel all of these are underwhelming. Of course, if one can control everyone and everything, that person can indeed force or influence those under control. This is obviously absolute superiority. I will refer to the restoring of life later in this section. Also, I use the spelling as Eeshitva and not Ishitva like in many sources, as I feel that is more accurate in comparison with the spelling in vernacular Indian languages.

Eesha is another word for God. It is very similar to the word Eeshwara. Eeshwara could specifically refer to Lord Shiva or generally mean God. Eesha is also the Guardian of the North-Eastern direction. So, however it is seen, Eesha refers to God. So, Eeshitva is about achieving the ability to be like God, be it in a fight or conflict or any situation in general. In other words, to be able to lord over all problems, if not simply, everything.

The definition of Eeshitva makes it clear that it will always be a work in progress for all humans. No mortal can become a God for there is no definition of Godhood. I cannot think of any examples for Eeshitva from either daily life or the martial arts/sports worlds. Of course, one can think of martial artists like Miyamoto Musashi who never lost a duel, or Venus Williams at her peak or Dhirubhai Ambani when he grew his company with seemingly no end, to have achieved Eeshitva for a time in a given context. But this is very similar to achieving Vashitva where the aforementioned people could control all variables in a duel or on a tennis court or in the business ecosystem, for they definitely seemed to be in complete control of their respective environments. But none of them could be Godlike since they were all specialists in their respective fields, as are most people on Earth. No human can claim control on everything and hence Godhood.

The above clearly shows how Vashitva in all areas, automatically leads to Eeshitva. This is why I had mentioned earlier that I prefer to place Eeshitva as the eight Siddhi, after Vashitva, as this is a stepping stone to being Godlike.

Even though no human can likely achieve Godhood, I would to refer to concepts from Budo, which show that the pursuit of improvement and accepting natural principles are universal and guide one to at least be able to be a conduit to divine inspiration and action, even if not actual Gods.

In Budo there is a concept called “Kami Waza”. This means the technique of the Gods. It refers to moving a fight in a way that seems like one is being guided by or moved by the Gods themselves. You could say, the person who seems Godlike, has let the Gods let her or himself be controlled by the Gods. By removing oneself from the situation, space has been made in their body, mind and spirit to allow the Gods to be in control. This is to cause the opponents to no longer be able to be an opponent. The choice of words here are deliberate, I am saying the opponent no longer being able to be one, not that the opponent is defeated, hurt or affected by any malicious intent. So, for normal humans allowing for a space where Godlike movement can be achieved, that is Eeshitva on a small scale in a given context.

Image credit – “Hanuman to the Rescue – Tales of Hanuman” published by Amar Chitra Katha

Here is where I would to refer to defining Eeshitva as being able to bring people back from the dead. In reality, for humans, this is similar to protecting people from death. If one can end a conflict with the least harm to people and minimal or no loss of life, with the help of Gods if necessary, this is close to being Godlike. Weapons of deterrence in the modern world could arguably, in a twisted way, be an example of this. If one is extremely good in the context of a fight and the opponent cedes without fighting, it is a step towards Eeshitva.

In the Bujinkan, like with Vashitva, there were a couple of themes studied a few years ago that could be stepping stones towards Kami waza, or Eeshitva. One is “Jin ryu kaname omamuru” and the other is “Shingin budo”. “Jin ryu kaname omamuru” refers to being able to see the essence with the eyes of the Gods. It means being able to perceive the crux of anything almost instantly, like the Gods can. “Shingin budo” refers to moving in a martial way while being guided by the brilliant artistry of the Gods. This means one’s martial movement seems to be awesome like that of the Gods or at least like one is guided by them.

Both of the above emphasize that one can be Godlike only by allowing the Gods to either control them or more appropriately by one allowing oneself to be a conduit for the Gods. This means that one’s perception is so on the dot or martial movement is that incredibly good, that it seems they are a vessel for the Gods. This begs the question how does one allow oneself to be a conduit for the Gods?

The Bujinkan system, time and again has emphasized that advanced practitioners should learn to unlearn, and strive to achieve self-control to control Uke (opponent). This means one should not be fixated on techniques and how they are done and should learn to adapt the same to the scenario. There is no need to be traditional and one should not celebrate a collection of techniques for their own sake. These should be a guide to natural movement. Natural movement just means doing the best thing that can be done in a given situation. This in turn means, one should be able to let go of intentions, plans, ego and emotions relating to a given scenario. This allows “Natural movement”. And when one is fully able to move naturally, one can hopefully find the best solutions at great speed, and this is akin to being guided by the Gods.

An example from Indian culture for letting go of oneself is how Lord Krishna does the only thing that is possible in his wars against Jarasandha. He did not fear disrepute when he ran away from the battlefield against Kaala Yavana, who in turn followed him to his death in a cave (this is a story beyond this article). He also decided to move his entire city state far away from Jarasandha’s neighbourhood and eventually Jarasandha was also slain off the battlefield. Using his ego against him was a big part of this, but again, this story is beyond the scope of this article.

Of course, just because the concepts exist, does not mean the path does. These concepts are difficult to practice to the point of impossibility, let alone achieve. And that brings me to end of this long winded look at the connections, from a personal perspective, between the classical Ashta Siddhi from Hindu culture and the concepts of Budo, specifically the Bujinkan system of martial arts.

Notes:

1. I sometimes use Bujinkan and Budo interchangeably. It is not really correct. But it is pretty representative. Apologies for this and a big thanks to my readers for bearing with me on this.

2. **Intuitive abilities are pretty synonymous with “mindfulness”

3. *** An example of this would be when Hanuman flew across the sea to Lanka and then to the Himalayas and back. Of course, this is an example of a God displaying a fantastic act, and not something that can ever be expected of humans.

4. I cannot think of any direct examples from stories in Hindu culture for Praapti and Praakaamya, without some personal interpretation being added. Praapti could be when Hanuman received the revelation of his forgotten powers from Jambawan exactly when he needed to be able to cross the sea to Lanka. Another example of Praapti that comes to mind is, when Yudishtira was distraught at not having starting capital for performing the Ashwamedha Yajna after the Kurukshetra war, Sage Veda Vyasa easily solved his problem by revealing the location of buried treasure that could pay for the entire enterprise. Thus, in both cases, Hanuman and Yudishtira had put themselves in a position where they could “receive” (obtain) exactly the solution they needed at the exact time when they needed it.

5. An example of Vashitva that comes to mind is that of Ravana. His capabilities were such that he could order the Sun around! When Hanuman was on his mission to bring the Sanjeevini plant to heal Lakshmana before the morning of the next day, Ravana ordered the Sun to rise earlier! Presumably to cause the temperature change to kill Lakshmana. This is control on a GRAND scale! But then, Hanuman, imprisoned the Sun temporarily to foil that! That is Eeshtiva, if ever there was an example of one.

“Saino Tamashii Utsuwa” and Shekhar Gupta’s Bell Curve theory of insurgent violence in India

Shekhar Gupta (currently the Editor-in-Chief at “The Print”), a very experienced and eminent (according to most) journalist of India has a theory regarding the lifecycle of violence due to insurgencies. He calls it the “Bell Curve theory”. This theory of his is a part of the inspiration behind this article.

Of course, as the title suggests, this write-up is also inspired by the term “Saino Tamashii Utsuwa”. This was the “Theme of the year” in the Bujinkan system of martial arts, for the year 2009. Saino Tamashii Utsuwa translates as “Expand (or add on to – Tamashii) the vessel (Utsuwa – referring to the capacity of the vessel) of your abilities (Saino)”. In simpler terms it means expand your abilities or skill sets. Considering the Bujinkan is mainly a system of martial arts, this meant, improve your skills or fine-tune your skills, or increase your skill set. It also could mean improve your ability to withstand or endure anything (this could relate to the soul which might represent endurance, patience and other abilities that cannot be objectively measured, but subjectively assessed).

The “Bell curve” Mr.Gupta uses as part of his theory is the normal bell curve used in statistics. He observes, based on his several years of reporting on various insurgencies in India in its different parts that the violence due to these insurgencies follows a Bell Curve. These insurgencies include the ones in the North-East – in Nagaland, Tripura, Mizoram and Assam, in the North – in Punjab and Kashmir and in the South, Centre and East of the country – in the Naxal affected states.

He observes that all these insurgencies start small, when they are not yet a matter of concern for the State (central and state governments). They then grow larger and more violent and eventually a peak of their violence is reached corresponding to the peak of the Bell curve. This is when the State has recognized the threat and trouble of the insurgency but the response to it has not yet reached the peak of its efficiency and effectiveness.

The next stage is when the response of the State, with its military, paramilitary, police, intelligence agencies, media narrative, revenue enforcement and logistics deprivation through all of the above, becomes overwhelming for the insurgents to handle. This forms the falling part of the bell curve, corresponding to the reduction and tapering of the violence. It also corresponds to the State and insurgents beginning a dialogue which eventually results in the end of the bell curve, when violence ends, and a political process begins with a permanent solution taking hold over time.

Sensei Hatsumi Masaaki, Soke of the Bujinkan system of martial arts (he has since handed over the 9 schools of martial arts that comprised the Bujinkan to different and new Sokes) had a system where he would announce a theme for every year. This indicated what the focus of training would be for the next year. This was a practice from around 1993 all the way till around 2016. After 2016, the generic focus has been “Muto Dori” until the pandemic disrupted normalcy.

Some of the themes were tangible and external, like a weapon (Bo, Yari, Naginata etc.) or a style of fighting (taihen jutsu, koppo jutsu, kosshi jutsu etc). But sometimes the theme was more abstract, a concept more than a physical aspect (Saino Tamashii Utsuwa, Rokkon Shoujo, Kihon Happo etc). The theme for the year 2009 was “Saino Tamashii Utsuwa” (sometimes also called “Saino Konki”).

The expectation for the year based on the theme was that the practitioners of Bujinkan improve their skills, in scale and scope. For example, if someone was good with the sword and not the spear, he or she was expected to improve with the spear while fine-tuning their skills with the sword and also to not let it diminish while the other skill is being enhanced. It was also expected that everyone also brush-up on to what they already knew but had lost partially over time. In other words, if the practitioner of Bujinkan is a vessel and that vessel is full to a point with certain skills, they were expected to not only add to the vessel, but also ensure that the size of the vessel increases and is added to, at the same time.

There is an obvious and simplistic observation to be made here. The bell curve looks like a mountain, but when it is turned around, it looks like a vessel. And any vessel is representative of potential or opportunity, as represented by the space in a vessel which can be filled.

This vessel that is represented by the “Utsuwa” in the theme, is also representative of the ability of the Indian State to always increase and improve its own capacity, in its soul and its abilities to deal with challenges of any nature as the State grows, ages and gains collective experience and wisdom. The challenges can be anything; economic, social, political, military or climatic. But here we look at this concept with reference to the insurgencies that Mr. Gupta refers to in his theory.

One should watch the videos on the YouTube channel of “The Print”, where Mr. Gupta explains the bell curve theory. He does a wonderful job of elucidating the same very eloquently. I will try and capture the key points from the theory here.

The early part of the bell curve is one where the State is not reacting to the insurgency as it does not seem much of a problem. But the problem and violence grow in brutality and in the number of incidences of violence. Eventually it reaches a peak when it seems that there will be no end to the increase in the violence. When things are at this peak, the State has already started responding, but while successful in many instances, it does not seem to be successful in reducing the instances of violence or mitigating the cause of the insurgency. This is true in all the following examples of insurgency against the Indian State.

The militancy in Punjab started in the early 1980s and was unabated all through that decade and it peaked in the years of 1991 and 1992. But it waned to being insignificant in the years after 1993. The militancy in the erstwhile J&K state started in 1989 and was unabated through the early 1990s. After this, the violence has diminished greatly. While it still exists today, it is a single burning home (a tragedy nonetheless) compared to the conflagration of the early 1990s.

The insurgencies in the Northeast started in late 1940s and are not yet completely over. But each state in the region had separate peaks and mitigation of the violence. Each state in the region also dealt with the local issues differently and at different periods of time. The insurgency in Mizoram peaked in the 60s and 70s and ended in the 80s. The same in Tripura ended in the 2000s. The insurgency in Assam was at its peak in the late 1990s and early 2000s and has abated to a large extent since. The insurgency in Nagaland has timelines similar that in Assam.

The greatest internal security threat as described by Dr. Manmohan Singh, the activities of Naxals, is also still going on, but is much diminished from the last decade. Though extremely brutal acts still do occur against CRPF personnel, these are reducing in number. The scale of the Naxal problem is vastly greater than the other insurgencies. It encompasses several states. In the words of Mr. Modi, Naxal activities extend from Tirupati (in Andhra Pradesh) to Pashupati (the Pashupatinath temple in Nepal). But the number of districts affected by Naxal activities has reduced significantly in the 2010s.

Mr. Gupta explains that all of these have followed the bell curve and are at various stages on the downward trend currently. The reasons for this are many. Mr. Gupta explains a few of the reasons and some are evident from various media reports over the last few decades, which show the strategies deployed by the Indian State.

In many insurgencies, the Army was deployed initially to deal with the surging violence. The army itself was not trained to deal with insurgents as against conventional enemies. The Army itself had to learn the skills to deal with the problems and also put in place procedures and mechanisms to deal with the problem in different geographies of the country. This also meant they had to start schools in different parts of the country to train troops to deal with the different types of scenarios, in some cases learning from and sharing knowledge with Armed Forces of other countries. Overtime, State Police forces learned specialized skills to deal with the different types of insurgencies and the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) also gained a lot of the skills to free up the Army for their more conventional roles.

All of this was backed by learning, building and putting in place structures and resources for continuously improving Intelligence Agencies which led to reducing casualties in the armed response units and reducing collateral damage in any operation. This also led to a greater understanding of what steps could be taken to mitigate the causes of the militancy and also open channels of communication with the insurgents.

With this started a virtuous cycle. The Indian State started with better transport and communication infrastructure which not only helped the armed units but also started off development opportunities in the areas affected by insurgencies. It helped affected communities, specifically tribals (adivasis), interact more with their fellow citizens. It brought better primary education to areas previously left behind. And this led to a greater understanding of the causes of the militancy and a fine tuning of the strategy to counter the same.

With better infrastructure, education and out-reach came the opportunity for more commercial development in underdeveloped areas, especially in the case of Naxal areas, where mining was always a huge opportunity. With development came the challenges of equitable distribution of the benefits, which is still a work in progress, but definitely forward progress.

Another area of the fight (skill set if you will) that the Indian State had to learn and fine tune all the time was the narrative battle and the response to it on many fronts (now there is a stream of economics called “Narrative Economics”!). The State had to firstly counter the narrative of grievances that the insurgency was peddling in almost all examples. This was to break the support the militant received from the locals, who would only do that if they saw examples of development and bought into the path of progress promised by the State. Also, the State had to convince its other citizens, who lived far away from the insurgency affected areas and were not affected by violence, that they were firstly not the villains of the story and that they were taking the right steps as the situation warranted.

An aside – Could the entire arena of narrative combat be akin to the concept of “Kyojitsu Tenkan Ho” that we train in the Bujinkan?

 Once the State had better prepared armed units, intelligence gathering, infrastructure and narrative combat skills, it could choke the logistics of the militants, mainly because the support of locals in the supply chain diminished.

With all the above additions to a State’s abilities, the insurgency was now on the receiving end. This opened the door to creating amnesty and rehabilitation opportunities for militants that would surrender, give up arms and revert to the mainstream of the nation’s citizenry. Once the option of giving up arms without consequences was opened, the virtuous cycle gathered pace and led to greater interaction with inhabitants of the insurgency affected areas, and gave greater momentum to back channel communications which became full-fledged talks to end the insurgency. *This is like allowing an Uke the option of ukemi and disengagement from the fight.

Now that bringing people back from militancy has been mentioned, Mr. Gupta makes a very interesting observation. Apparently, the Indian state avoids killing the top leadership of an insurgency. It does eliminate lower level operatives when necessary, but does not go after the top leadership, because they are the ones who can be negotiated with and convinced to join mainstream politics. This method has apparently resulted in insurgent leaders in the North East, J&K and Punjab joining electoral politics and becoming ministers or even chief ministers in rare cases. Once this happens, the insurgency ends and political processes can take over. When a political process takes over, leaders are held responsible for development. This apparently leads to a populace getting addicted to peace, so long as there is a “peace dividend”.

The “peace dividend” refers to development that improves the quality of life and increases prosperity for a populace over time. This requires actions of the State that are not specific to countering an insurgency, but activities that are of great benefit to all the people in the country as a whole.

This includes activities where schemes of the State are delivered with not much leakage of benefits, and to the sections of a population that need them most. And if there is specific development like mining in an area with Naxal influence, the benefit from the mining should be visible and reach the locals of the area specifically. Of course, if this sounds like a welfare state, then the State needs continuous and large economic growth to have the resources to distribute. This should go hand in hand with protection of local cultures and the inhabitants should not be inundated with a migrant population, to alleviate fears of a way of life being threatened. This is true whether it is the North East, Punjab or J&K, for all parts of the country have a lot of pride in their respective ways of life.

These general development activities bring to mind two other concepts from the Martial Arts. One is “Rokkon Shoujo”, which means “clear laughter is the greatest reward”. This essentially means the focus should be on happiness, and the focus of a State’s activities should focus on the happiness of a populace. So, this is not specific to counter insurgency, but to general development as a whole.

The second is “Kaitatsu Gairoku”. This means “doing things indirectly”. It refers to a feint in the martial arts that could lead to creating an opening against an opponent. So, The State focuses on economic development, and its equitable distribution and this weakens insurgencies by its very nature. This is weakening an insurgency by focusing on something else. This is a classic example of defeating an insurgency with indirect actions.

Of course, Rokkon Shojo and Kaitatsu Gairoku are deeper concepts that need to be explored with separate articles with more clear examples. Nevertheless, these actions of the State go on to show that a State not only adds to its learning and experience with specific aspects relating to dealing with a violent insurgency, but also incorporates concepts that affect the solution to the violence without direct measures. This is similar to learning a concept in the martial arts as against a technique and applying it with any other weapon or technique.

In conclusion, each of the above points, is an ability learnt by a government, expanded upon with the past experience and knowledge (of previous administrations), by successive governments. To simplify, the Indian State can be considered the budoka and each of the strategies applied against an insurgency represents an increase in its Utsuwa of responses. The soft and hard strategies are the Saino, both of which are always being increased (tamashii).

Of course, all the learnings and techniques of the Indian State is not to imply that these are the only ones out there. Several countries have faced and either defeated or mitigated armed insurgencies of varying scales in the last century. These insurgencies were of both right and left wing extremists, a small number of examples of this are the Red Brigades in Italy, the Red Army Faction (Bader Meinhof Group) in West Germany, the OAS in France and the Provincial IRA in the UK. But the scale and number of violent insurgencies faced by the Indian State is vastly greater, as is its resolve (more space in the Utsuwa) to never give in, take all hits it has to (in lives, in the media, narratives, economy growth etc.) but always survive and emerge stronger – a much larger and accommodating vessel. Just living in this country, and knowing this history is a great walk through the concept of “Saino Tamashii Utsuwa” and motivation enough to practice the same, at least in the dojo.

*As mentioned in the article “Ahimsa and the Martial Arts – Part 3”

Ahimsa and the Martial Arts – Part 3

Indian Independence & the Revolutionary Movement – The Gift of Ukemi

Artwork by Shushma N

In the previous two write-ups in this series I have opined that Ahimsa is about not letting the opponent realize that he/she/they are being countered and making them retreat or just give up the fight/aggression that was initiated by the opponents’ side. I also opined that this concept can be applied not only to a one on one fight, but also to a large scale conflict spread across a vast geography (the example used was the Indian Freedom Struggle).

In this part of this series, the last one for now, I shall express a few of the remaining thoughts I have had over time with regard to Ahimsa in the martial arts and how the same is also evident ( at least to me) in the struggle for Indian independence from the British Raj. Of course, I need to reiterate here, the application of martial arts concepts is from my own perspective and with the benefit of hindsight.

When we train in the Bujinkan, after a considerable amount of training, we begin to realize that a lot of the times we support the opponent. This is very true in the Nage Waza or “throwing” related movements. “Support the opponent” here means that the opponent is not only being held up by the tensions in one’s (defender’s) own body, but also by being able to sense where the threat to him or herself is likely to come from based on the same. Here, “tensions in one’s own body” refers to the strength all of us use in defending against or resisting the attack of an opponent. Specifically, with relation to the Nage Waza and related concepts (maybe movements), when an opponent is being thrown, he or she can stop him or herself from falling by sensing (feeling) the resistance from the person executing the throw and latching onto the person based on that feedback. This is why we are taught that in the Nage Waza, we need to learn to “let the opponent fall” and how that should be enabled by gravity, not individual strength.

Once we understand (or at least say/accept) that a lot of throwing of opponents happens by letting the opponent fall, we need to learn what position and space we need to occupy in relation to a specific attack from an opponent. A specific set of movements might be needed to occupy the space and posture in relation to an attacker to take his or her balance and make them fall. This is the whole purpose of Nage Waza training.

Now, when seen from the perspective of an attacker, when he or she is falling, he or she will fall in a manner that will be least painful and causes least bodily harm due to the same. This is what we call Ukemi or “receiving the ground”. In common parlance, an attacker executes a break-fall or a roll while falling to come out of the fall unhurt or at least with minimal injury.

Consider a situation where an attacker either cannot perform a good ukemi or has only the option of an ukemi that will result in significant physical injury (or worse). This situation delays the attacker (Uke) from performing an ukemi to retreat from the attack he or she initiated. Often enough, in the absence of a good fall-back option like a break-fall or roll, the attacker will fight harder and try to force a tension in the defender’s body to latch on to, thus mitigating or nullifying the need for an ukemi. Therefore, the defender (Tori), by disallowing an ukemi for the attacker, might extend the fight by not allowing the Uke to retreat with an ukemi.

An aside – It can also be argued that the Tori becomes Uke in such a situation (denial of ukemi), especially if the Tori has to resort to use of physical strength that reverses the gained advantage with the earlier movement. Of course, very skilled practitioners can deny an ukemi and also prevent a fightback from the uke (this is a deserving discussion for different time). Here, at least in a practice scenario, the tori physically stops uke from falling, thus gaining the gratitude of the uke for the life-saving move. This “saving the uke” is an act of benevolence and also results in the ending of the current attack.

With this introduction in the background, I would like to recall a sentence I had read in a newspaper op-ed back when Operation Parakram was going on. This was the massive military build-up that India had used to retaliate against the attack on the Indian parliament back in December 2001. I do not recall the newspaper name, but I think it was The Hindu. The sentence said that one of the things that the Indian Government and the Military leadership was cognizant of was that they did not want to push the then Pakistani Dictatorship to think they did not have any wriggle room in the discussions with India. This feeling along with a belief that a massive invasion was imminent would push them to the wall. And the knowledge that Pakistan would not be able to win a conventional war against India along with no faith in negotiations would drive them towards the nuclear option in the war. This was something that India did not want, for it would adversely affect India and also not result in the scaling down of terrorism which was the objective of the military mobilization in the first place. In hindsight, India succeeded, to a limited extent, in getting Pakistan to act on terrorism emanating from its soil and there was no war. Op Parakram was called “gun-boat diplomacy” as well by some, for this reason.

But the key here is that the option of negotiation was the ukemi that the attacker could use to disengage and end the fight. The lack of this option would have resulted in a military conflict with unforeseeable consequences which need not have been favourable to either the attacker or defender.

I have used the above example because it perfectly encapsulates the use of diplomacy with military capabilities to achieve a strategic or geopolitical objective, with minimal or no use of the kinetic military option. And all this in a short time frame of less than a year.

If we can look back towards the Indian Freedom Struggle with the above example and the use of ukemi in mind, some wonderful revelations are likely. This is especially true if we consider the work of a lot of new historians who are beginning to opine that Indian Independence from the British Raj was not just due to the Ahimsa (supposedly “non-violent”) and movement of the Indian National Congress (INC), but also due to the work of the armed Revolutionary Movement, the pinnacle of which was the Indian National Army (INA) under Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose.

It is well documented, and these days, pretty widely mentioned, that Clement Atlee, the PM of Britain when India won independence, stated that Gandhiji and the movement led by him (I suppose we could say the movement spearheaded by the INC?) was of very little relevance in the final British decision to leave India and acquiesce to Indian Independence. This statement is supposed to have been made when he was on a visit to India in 1956, when he was staying at the residence of the then Chief Justice of Bengal. Further, Clement Atlee is supposed to have credited the British decision to leave India to the spark lit by Netaji and the rebellion in the then Royal Indian Armed Forces (the greatest of which was the rebellion by the Royal Indian Navy in 1946).

So, Indian Independence was a consequence of the well-known Freedom Struggle and also loss of control of the armed forces in India. The rebellion in the armed forces after the end of the Second World War itself was triggered by the trials in the Red Fort of the prisoners of the INA. The INA being a product of the armed revolutionary movement, it is clear that the objective of this movement was always to turn the British Indian Army against the British. With the Army being staffed mostly by Indians with British leadership, the loss of control of the army was always going to be the end of the British Raj.

This idea of throwing the British out by subversion of the British Indian Army had been the same since the First War of Independence in 1857, which also occurred due to troops of the then East India Company (EIC) rebelling against the Company. After the failure in 1857, the idea was revived in the early 20th century with many events working towards the same goal, during the First World War which were not successful. Eventually, the same idea came to fruition after the Second World War. In the interim when the idea of subverting the army was on the back burner post the failed Mutiny of 1857, the INC was born in 1885 and initiated the parallel struggle for freedom through a political process, which is the better known “non-violent” movement.

For greater details about the revolutionary movement, I strongly suggest looking for and watching the talks given by Mr. Sanjeev Sanyal*. There are several of those on YouTube, all very interesting. This is one of my own main sources of knowledge about these aspects. There are others out there as well sharing the happenings of these times in differing ways**.

So, the armed revolutionary movement was instrumental in taking away the Indian Armed forces from the British, while Gandhiji and the INC were responsible for breaking the British moral high ground and belief in their own responsibility to civilize India after a Western model.

I have mentioned my thoughts on the use of the Ahimsa movement in using British moral superiority against themselves in a previous article***. In that article I have also mentioned that the Ahimsa movement provided a safety valve and a face saving exit out of India, for the British. This is exactly like keeping negotiations on during Op Parakram. In other words, the Ahimsa movement was the Ukemi allowance to the Nage Waza of the armed revolutionary movement.

The British were financially weak after the Second World War and the training and knowledge of weaponry they had imparted to Indian troops during the same had mitigated their technological superiority. And thus, with the loss of the Indian Armed Forces, their last tool to hold the country they had occupied over the last two centuries was taken away from them. This was them being subjected to an absolute bad-ass Nage Waza, a literal being “thrown out”!

This left them with taking the Ukemi option provided by the INC, for a face saving retreat, thus ending the struggle India had not asked for. The British were forced to negotiate earnestly with the INC about complete Independence and not just spare concessions like they had in the earlier decades. This allowed them to survive the “fall” due to the “Nage” of the revolutionary movement. They could hold on to the face saving belief in being civilized by acquiescing to the call for Indian Independence and over time sweep from the mind the fact of being “thrown” out.

So, the twin use of the revolutionary movement and the political movement of the INC were the Nage Waza and “allowed” Ukemi that showed the British the path of retreat, and nullified the aggression that led to the Freedom Struggle in India****.

Notes:

*Mr. Sanyal is the Principal Economic Advisor to the Govt. of India and a member of the PM’s Economic Advisory Council. He is also a wonderful historian who has written multiple books.

**One very recent book called “True to Their Salt” by Ravindra Rathee comes to mind. I have not read this book, only watched an interview with the author, about the book.

***Ahimsa and the Martial Arts – Part 2

****Does this have a parallel in the IRA / Sinn Fein tandem movement? Perhaps this is something to look at, for if true, would be a second use of the same Nage – Ukemi combination against the same colonizer.